Sunday, February 16, 2014

Valentine's Day Post: Courtship in Disney Movies

Hello, all, and a happy late Valentine's. Here is a post on more Disney, and then I'll probably return to thoughts on OCs, or original characters.

Image source: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2036/2406372163_b9b483b5a3.jpg


Matt Anderson for the holiday has written about the lost art of wooing and courtship, and the benefits of agreeing to take it slow with a potential, attractive partner. Merriam-Webster online defines courtship as "the activities that occur when people are developing a romantic relationship that could lead to marriage or the period of time when such activities occur". Avatar: The Last Airbender has poked fun with this definition, with Sokka suggesting to do "an activity" with a Northern Water tribe princess, much to her amusement.

Courtship was the transition activity between arranged marriages of the medieval ages and the 1920s flapper dates that plague The Great Gatsby. It has existed through the ages, to pave the way for true romance to occur between eligible partners, while avoiding social scandal. 

The early Disney movies focus little on courtship; I admit that fact. In their defense, however, their source material ALSO had few instances courtship or interaction between male and female romantic leads. In the case of Mary Poppins and The Rescuers, the authors requested that the relationships remain platonic and thus they remained as such. I will argue that the courtship existed and extended as time went on and the animators were willing to explore how to make a relationship interesting and child-friendly onscreen, skipping over less obvious works like Fantasia, which featured a ballet courtship in "Pastoral Symphony" and "Dance of the Hours"; and animated features where the romantics leads do not end up together, like The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad, Pocahontas or Peter Pan. Wreck-It-Ralph I'm also not touching, because the film shares character information via flashbacks rather than by romantic

Image source: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2143/2286528193_ed2fe2bc42.jpg


Consider Snow White and Sleeping Beauty, the first princess movies that later spouted a commercial merchandise line in the 1990s, as justifications for little courtship. Both fairy tales feature the titular characters marrying the first prince who wakes them from their enchanted comas, and the Disney versions actually improve on the creepy implications by having the princesses meet their love interests early on into the movies rather than hedge him into the ending scene at the last minute.

In lieu of a marriage contract or chaperoned outings, Disney movies display courtship with song and dance. Snow White's prince answers her prayer to have a loved one, for example, with a short but succinct "One Song" that makes an impression on her and the wicked queen. Snow White remains smitten for the whole movie, which ends up saving her life. Aurora and Prince Philip have their waltz to "Once Upon a Dream" and actually plan to meet later in the cottage. They would have had a proper date had the fairies not had to take Aurora to the palace for her sixteenth birthday and spindle curse, so one cannot blame the characters for marrying after Maleficent dies as a fiery dragon because they were willing to know the other. This tradition later carried on to Cinderella, which again had courtship restrained to a waltz and duet, as well as Robin Hood.


 Image source: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7295/8748710280_bfa0c1043e_n.jpg

Lady and the Tramp was the first Disney film to actually feature a "date," complete with romantic accordion music and the famous spaghetti kiss. The characters took time to get acquainted, and even consider running away from domestic England, but at the same time, the writers knew that one wondrous date does not guarantee true love. Both the titular characters have to prove genuine affection for the other after Lady accidentally ends up in the pound and learns of her date's flaws, to say the least. Tramp does so by rescuing a baby from a rat, at a personal risk, and  Lady proves her love by saving Tramp from the dog catchers. This film comes from the 1950s, during the same time period as Sleeping Beauty, the other princess film mentioned earlier.

101 Dalmations features an instance of courtship AFTER a marriage, between Roger and Anita Radcliffe, that indicates how their premarital romance played out. The couple meets after falling into a pond together, thanks to a determined dog, and realizing they can laugh about their wet predicament; this instant revealed a mutual sense of humor and grace in response to a silly situation. We see the wedding soon after, but the film compensates by showing a marriage filled with similar, silly rapport.

 Roger writes a song about his wife's old schoolmate, much to Anita's annoyed amusement, and dances with her in tune to the song. The few seconds, and the smile they share at the end shows benevolent chemistry and knowledge they have of the other. Roger knows that Anita cannot resist his silly nature, and she knows that he means no true harm. Pongo and Perdita, the married couple's Dalmation parents, also show affection and support for the other when rescuing their puppies from Cruella.



Beauty and the Beast and The Little Mermaid were the first Disney movies that tackled courtship and how the art relates to true love. Once again, both instances of courtship were taken from the source material-- the original little mermaid spent months living in her beloved prince's house before he married another, and Beauty stayed for at least a year with her Beast, only loving him when seeing him close to death.

The Little Mermaid features the second onscreen date for Disney, as well as the love interests taking time to know each other. After rescuing her from the beach and treating her as a palace guest, Eric shows his kingdom to Ariel, who cannot talk. She learns that Ariel loves dancing, carriage driving, and shopping in the kingdom marketplace and most importantly, he learns her name. 


One fantastic day, however, does not guarantee a happy marriage. Ursula sets Ariel's terms knowing full well that true love cannot blossom in that time; she specifies that the "kiss of true love" has to happen, and gentlemanly Eric makes it clear early on in the film that he wants to love and marry a woman that he can respect. He becomes obsessed with the maiden who rescues him from drowning because she saved his life in the middle of a storm, which takes guts. Ariel without a voice or means to survive on land appears more as a damsel in distress than a figure of respect, and she earns that respect by showing her ability to drive a carriage with vigor, waltz gracefully, and make Eric laugh. He sees her at her craziest, learns her name, and realizes that he can try to love this mute girl even if he can never find the strange maiden who saved him from drowning. His attempt to kiss during their rowboat date, and then to talk to her later that night, reveals that true love has happened, much to Ursula's chagrin. Small wonder that she sabotages Ariel's chance for permanent humanity, and that Eric takes on the sea witch with a broken ship to rescue his mermaid. Actions matter more than love songs, since Eric doesn't even sing in the film, and he certainly takes action to fight for what he wants while remaining a gentleman.

Beauty and the Beast had a tongue-in cheek approach to the idea of courtship, thanks to Gaston. The town hero and most charming gentleman in town, Gaston plans "to woo and marry Belle," after winning every local lady's heart. To demonstrate his interest in her single status, he throws her books in the mud and imagines a future where she only serves as a child-bearer and a quiet wife. Belle pushes him in the mud in retaliation and shows no reciprocation of his obsession.

Image source: http://farm2.staticflickr.com/1422/1404643210_479c462a01_z.jpg

Gaston performs false courtship because he makes no effort to understand Belle better.  We certainly know what Gaston wants out of a long-term relationship, and we also know that his good looks redeem his jerk qualities for the simpler village girls, but he cannot win Belle's heart with an abrasive approach. These actions contrast greatly with those of the Beast, who after saving Belle from the wolves bonds with her over a love of books and feeding birds. The Broadway adaptation carries Gaston's arrogance further with the song "Me" below; he attempts an awkward waltz with Belle that does not win her favor, for he doesn't ask about her desires or dreams.


The Beast, unlike Gaston, takes time to understand Belle's dreams and desires, satisfying them as best as he can. Although he fails in the first attempt, inviting her to dinner on her first night as a castle "prisoner" or "guest," he wins her trust by saving her from a pack of wolves and her affection by gifting her with an entire library. Even after this magnificent gift, and an elegant ballroom dance, however, true love doesn't occur for one reason: Belle is obligated to stay in the castle. When Beast releases her from that promise, thereby proving his desire for her happiness, Belle returns of her own free will to rescue him from the mob. Once again, the couple has to prove their love through their actions, done at a personal risk.

As American animation entered the 1990s, Disney realized that relationships needed to develop onscreen, to build plausibility. Aladdin and Jasmine have their magic carpet ride, for example, but also date in the television spinoff series; Tarzan and Jane spent months getting acquainted in the African jungle; Simba from The Lion King married his best friend from childhood; Phoebus and Esmeralda do not get married in Hunchback of Notre Dame but maintain a flirting rapport during the film. Even the lesser-known films such as Treasure Planet had romantic couples taking time onscreen to develop from awkward captain and navigator relationships.

With that, we then turn to Disney's return to serious animated film, The Princess and the Frog, in 2009. The trend when adapting fairy tales was to get rid of the "marry him with no character development" ending and make the romances more socially acceptable. Such a change becomes a narrative risk but for most of the films worked out in the long run.

For Princess and the Frog, the title characters do nothing but court each other or try to break the voodoo curse that has turned them into green amphibians. That said, the courting does not start intentionally; Tiana kisses the transformed Prince Naveen after he hints of financial recompense, thus turning into a frog as well. The two spend most of the night and next morning arguing about how to become human again, and only bond after fighting off frog-hunters and Dr. Facilier, the Shadow Man.

Personally, I feel that the courtship in Princess was very forced, in terms of showing how two different people learn to love each other. Instead of one kiss ending their problems, Naveen and Tiana have their flaws, and they spend the film overcoming them. Tiana teaches the prince how to mince mushrooms and pass on survival skills that he never learned, while he invites her to loosen up and share her dream with the people she loves. In addition, the swamp animals play music to accompany their waltz and local wise woman Mama Odie expresses that they both need love to become human again.

Image source: http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121008160127/disney/images/8/81/Ma_Belle_Evangeline.png

My pet peeve with this narrative is that Tiana already has loved ones in her life: her mother Eudora and best friend Charlotte. The song "Almost There" features Tiana singing about her dream to her mother. Charlotte also cheers when she can help Tiana reach her dream, by buying made-to-orders beignets in bulk and then later agreeing to fund her. The young waitress only loses sight of her values when kissing Naveen for money, while she is desperate after learning that another customer has bought the building she wanted. Also, she doesn't fight Dr. Facilier out of love for Naveen, but rather out of love for her father and what he valued. I would have felt more comfortable with this interpretation if Tiana's willingness to lose sight of her values was more pronounced, or if she and Naveen had not been portrayed as extreme polar opposites. While opposites do attract, the film compresses too much character development into two hours that would not happen in real life. There has to be a spark of attraction rather than a dose of people learning to overcome their flaws.

Tangled, unlike Princess and the Frog, features that spark of attraction, and much less character development to compress. Rapunzel and Flynn Rider, aka Eugene, are simpler characters because unlike the grown-up Tiana and Naveen, who have lived in the adult world for several years, they are young adults in need of a maturity spree. Their coming-of-age rings truer to the audience, because the emotions are more grounded in reality.

Image source: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7339/9602960306_49f155b779.jpg

Keep in mind, Tangled makes huge changes to "Rapunzel," the original fairy tale, the biggest being the amount of time that Rapunzel spends getting to know her prince. She talks to him every day and ends up pregnant, before mother Gothel banishes her to the desert and blinds the prince. Disney, to make Rapunzel more of an active heroine and her love interest less of a playboy, decided to eliminate the unsavory parts of that courtship and rebuild the romance for the child-friendly film.

Tangled has a simpler story than Princess; Rapunzel wants to see the "floating lights" that shine on her birthday each year, and conscripts a rugged thief to escort her to and from her tower home, in exchange for a crown that he stole. Flynn Rider does all he can to get out of the escort job, first by guilting Rapunzel into returning home, and then taking her to a shifty pub called the Snuggly Duckling to show her how gritty the real world is. He shows a knack for lying and deception that backfires on him when the royal guards show up for the crown.

Note, however, that Flynn never intends to harm Rapunzel or leave her alone in the world; despite being a rogue, he also keeps her safe while attempting to receive his crown back. One could argue that he needs her alive to get the satchel back, but he intends to scare her straight with the Snuggly Duckling thugs and return to the tower without resorting to violence. He remains a shifty gentleman thief but never a dangerous one.

We see more potential for his character when he and Rapunzel nearly drown; a few minutes from death, he decides to let go of his thief guise and reveals his real name. This first instance of honesty ends up saving him, for Rapunzel reveals and realizes that her magical hair can help them find an exit. These mutual secrets and the near-death experience bring them closer during the campfire scene.

Image source: http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120507154711/disney/images/8/81/Campfire.jpg

Rapunzel, who has already impressed Flynn with her hair athletics and ability to wield a frying pan, shows respect for his real name and person by asking for his tale, and later expressing preference for "Eugene" over "Flynn". He in turn understands why she never left the tower. Flynn uncovers a vulnerable side to this thieving facade, talking about his admiration for a fictional hero who did whatever he wanted because he had enough money to not worry about anything. His desire for the crown rests in childlike fear of being alone, and at the world's mercy. Rapunzel, knowing what it's like to live in fear, gently coaxes him to accept himself without preaching to him about personal integrity. Without these characters having such a natural conversation after nearly dying, they would have remained good friends at best instead of potential romantic partners. They understand each other better, and Flynn develops a protective instinct for Rapunzel.

Last but not least is Frozen, an adaptation of "The Snow Queen," which mocks the classic Disney notions of true love. We have sisters Anna and Elsa, the latter as Anna's guardian and new Arendelle queen. Isolated from Elsa and friends for years, Anna craves true love and a partner. She finds a partner in Prince Hans of the Southern Isles and shares a duet with him.

Image source: http://www.rotoscopers.com/wp-content/gallery/frozen-storybook/frozen-storbook-movie-theatre-hans-anna-boat.jpg

I'm not going to spoil how things end with Hans and Anna, but Elsa as queen doesn't approve of the match. She says, "You can't marry someone you've just met" and establishes the engagement as a violation of royal decorum. Without several months of love letters, courtship, and negotiations with both families for a wedding, Hans and Anna do not take time to get to know each other, only learning that they finish each other's sandwiches and that they each are younger siblings. Kristoff, an ice farmer who helps Anna out, even mocks this point by asking Anna about Hans's show size.  The writers were attempting to show how a Snow White or Sleeping Beauty scenario would play out in real life, if normal people educated the princesses about true love.

As I have argued above, however, quite a few animated Disney films have more than one date or romantic song guaranteeing true love; actions and knowledge matter more than voices that blend well on the soundtrack. In fact, Disney creates an ideal that the person a princess loves will fight for her to show his devotion, but will have to face ample stumbling blocks before earning the happy marriage or well-deserved kiss.  
 



Saturday, January 25, 2014

New Year Announcements and Truth BlogFest



truth

First off, a few happy announcements: Sorcerous Signals has accepted my short story "The Soothsayer" for publication in May, and Page & Spine will be publishing my technical poem "In Sickness and in Health" ! When both are available online, I will be sure to post up the links so that you can enjoy them.

If you have the means, both Page & Spine and Sorcerous Signals depend on reader donations, so donate to either via Paypal. Page & Spine in particular emphasizes finding new writers and talent, so be sure to support them.

Now, onto a blog fest in which I'm participating. Jamie Ayres is promoting her new book 18 Truths, and she has invited fellow bloggers to participate till January 28th. These are the rules"

"All you have to do is post a blog centering around the classic Two Truths and a Lie get-to-know-you game"

Below are two truths and one lie. Feel free to guess which one is the lie:

1. I have written a short story chronicling all the dead animals and pets I have encountered in my life, minus a dead beta fish that I loved dearly.

2. This story was written freshman year of college, the same year I went crazy trying to balance orchestra and choir.

3. The story disturbed my creative writing class with the amount of dead animals, proving that real life can be stranger than fiction

Go crazy, and if you have a blog try and participate!

Edit: Wow, this got a lot of press. So the lie is . . . (highlight to see) NUMBER TWO! I actually wrote "Piggy" in my sophomore year of college, for Fiction Workshop when we had to combine story elements that were based on our lives for a short story.  It was true that I went crazy trying to balance orchestra and choir freshman year, but only for a semester. It seems that half the audience got this right, so congrats!

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Fanfiction, Fandoms, and Fear of the Mary Sue

            Happy New Year, everyone. Apologies for not blogging, but here is post three on Fanfiction. We're entering dangerous waters now.


 Source: http://farm1.staticflickr.com/59/212677871_451eda44c6.jpg

Matt Anderson has read my HTTYD fanfiction, and he asked me why I didn't introduce an OC -- an original character-- into the HTTYD universe, or make the story more accessible to readers who weren't familiar with the movie or the show's villains. He even wrote a blog post about context, how such knowledge can make or break a fanfiction if the audience becomes privy to the information.

I had a perfectly logical explanation for why I didn't include an OC until diving into Norse and Germanic mythology and using obscure deities: I didn't want to create a Mary Sue. I didn't want to put an idealized version of myself, or any unnecessary character, into a world filled with imperfect characters and fun banter. In my view, HTTYD was already filled with enough interesting characters that I wanted to chronicle, and to put them through the wringer.

For those who don't know, the Mary Sue as described by TV Tropes is "a character that is important in the story, possesses unusual physical traits, and has an irrelevantly over-skilled or over-idealized nature." The male version is called Marty or Gary Stu, though the term Mary Sue was coined in response to female authors inserting female characters into the Star Trek fandom, usually avatars of their female selves.  


Source: http://farm2.staticflickr.com/1020/873797895_8084d78cab.jpg

As you can imagine, Mary and Gary don't have a good reputation, and they exist in every established fandom. Shows like NCIS and The Big Bang Theory have made reference to inserting oneself into an established canon, all for the sake of entering that particular world and escaping reality. In essence, the female or male author bares his real self, and expects that in this fictional world that everyone will like him or her.

One fact about Mary Sue characters: they don't last long in anyone's mind, even the author's. I learned it the hard way, by drawing bad hero comics in elementary school, and then switching to Harry Potter fanfiction that has (mercifully) vanished; my bad hero comics had me flying around, being the only survivor of a disaster, and defeating the strangely gun-shaped bad guys. Around the same time this happened, I lost my elementary school friends after inserting them as the rest of a hero team that I concocted, though I'm not sure if the events were related.
 
Did I learn from my early storytelling mistakes? Heck no! I inserted a character like myself AGAIN, this time into the animated Teen Titans fandom, though at least I had the sense to make her imperfect and not liked by everyone. Even so, I never finished her stories because they weren't fulfilling enough, not when I knew myself better than anyone else did, and there were no surprises for me when digging for hidden depths. I borrowed plot lines from Japanese anime and the Teen Titans comics, without seeing what I could do on my own. Thus, when I returned to the realm of fanfiction fall 2011, I vowed to use no OCs, since canon seemed to have enough character fodder and not enough plot resolution for my liking. When I did decide to break that rule, I went into Norse mythology as mentioned before and helped myself to the more obscure gods.

   

Image source: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4108/5186407183_ea3c1ee740.jpg

One year later, however, I remember one other important thing; all Mary Sues are OCs, but not all OCs are Mary Sues. This is an important truth for fanfiction writers, and even for those pursuing original fiction, because original characters are just that: original characters. Going back to Hitchups, the OCs there range from foreign Viking warriors to Timberjack dragons to mermaids, and even then AvannaK relies heavily on mythology to support her narrative. LuciferDragon's fanfiction series about the Boogieman family depicts a very brash and imperfect spirit of Halloween, who while dealing with serial killer revenants and the devil, gets varying reactions from her partner, child and coworkers.

Matt, when I discussed benefits of the Mary Sue with him, brought up the good points of having such a character:

"Well, for one, familiarity breeds understanding. If the character is you, you understand them entirely. You know their deal and what they want. For two, the character wins all the time. It gets us into the mindset of continuing a character through their story as the hero. But if we learn that these characters can evolve, have flaws . . . yet still win, we can have a golden combination."

Most writers advocate writing what you know, and for the most part we know ourselves the best, our favorite food, if we sleep with the lights off, and what books we'll keep by our beds. We also have less trouble when facing the infamous writer's block.

There is another reason, however, why new writers should practice with the Mary Sue, within or outside of fanfiction, because the Mary Sue inspires us to keep writing. The comic below illustrates that reason perfectly:


Source: http://assets.amuniversal.com/86fa06e05e2f012ee3bf00163e41dd5b

Roger Fox's novel, about himself as a James Bond agent that attracts all the ladies' eyes, is terrible. I would recommend reading the rest of the hilarious storyline and thus his novel, but essentially Roger pens adventure and romance he would like to have, and he chronicles these exploits in a weekend. If he had decided to follow Matt's advice, to make his alter ego less perfect and endure a stronger narrative arc, then he could have been a prolific writer. 

Embrace your inner Mary Sue if you're a beginning writer; don't be afraid to put yourself on the written page, even with your physical or personality traits changed. Just be aware that Mary Sues don't have to be your only OCs. Be willing to write about grumpy blacksmiths or crazy cat lovers, or even the police officer helping the good guys out.

Friday, December 13, 2013

We Need Fanfiction: An Analysis of Hitchups and More

Second post on fanfiction and partly an opinion piece inspired by this StoryDam prompt.

Most published authors will not read fanfiction of their work. They do not avoid fan works because of arrogant sentiments or feelings; authors have legal issues to worry about. Tamora Pierce, YA fantasy author and  puts it best on her website: 

"Sometimes in the heat of the battle with a book, we grab any idea that surfaces, without necessarily knowing where it came from. I've since gone back to find things I've fitted to my use in books and movies I read years ago. I can't take the chance that someone else's ideas might enter the stew where my creativity happens, to surface years later: that's how writers get sued for copyright infringement/theft. It's nothing against fanfics or their writers, and everything to do with me covering my behind."

Tamora Pierce also encourages young writers to write fanfiction to gain writing experience, but one can learn more than structuring a plot the way that I did. One can also learn how to ask the tough questions, to disrupt order in an established world.

One can make characters extremely imperfect and have them go through personal changes. That's what one epic, famous fanfiction did for the film How to Train Your Dragon.

What Hitchups Taught Me

Hitchups is an HTTYD fanfiction, an epic adventure of Tolkien length and Alternate Universe of what happened in the movie. Do not read past this line for spoilers of Hitchups, or for the movie How to Train Your Dragon. You have been warned.
Image source: http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/333/a/b/hitchupscover_small_by_ch4rms-d4hpucw.png

Fanfiction for particular works of fiction can have subcategories, variations of the same idea; HTTYD fanfiction is not exception. These subcategories do not define HTTYD fanfiction rigidly, and I know I haven't followed them, but they ask similar questions regarding the narrative. Hitchups follows one question that the movie couldn't have answered: "What if Hiccup had run away during the third act?"

My former screenwriting professor Tom Musca always talked about "tyranny of the narrative," a constraint upon the characters' actions and the consequences they face within two hours of screen time. The movie format imposes this "tyranny" by forcing the protagonists and antagonists to make decisions that will tell a story. Not all films follow such a format, and art films make a point of ignoring conventions, but most adventure stories have to conform.

Because HTTYD is an adventure story, it must conform to tyranny of the narrative. This creative obligation comes to full force in HTTYD's third act, when Hiccup nearly leaves his home, the island of Berk. His love interest Astrid comes in on the scene and grounds him, leading to one of the most hilarious Toothless moments and a romantic flight through a cloudy sky. The audience knows that he won't run off with his dragon Toothless because we have twenty minutes of film left, but fanfiction has explored what would have happened without that tyrannical narrative.

"Hitchups"was one of the first "what if Hiccup ran away" variations, and it remains the best that I have read so far. I will outline my reasons below, but these reasons are based on the following facts that writers can learn:

1) No story is perfect, especially a story that sacrifices characterization for plot necessities.

2) It is all right to acknowledge that a story is imperfect, while enjoying it thoroughly.

3)  Fanfiction can help us address a story's imperfections, and to correct them with the written word.

"Hitchups" first addresses one of the pressing issues in HTTYD: female character development. The movie has two notable females: Astrid Hofferson, Hiccup's rival and love interest in Dragon Training, and the Village Elder Gothi. Gothi only has a few minutes of screen time, but her decision to choose Hiccup to slay a dragon impacts the third act. Astrid also impacts the third act by changing her mind about dragons, after going on a wild ride with Hiccup and Toothless. Nevertheless, the characters exist in only how they determine Hiccup's subsequent actions.

The movie limits Astrid's character  by delegating her as the love interest who keeps Hiccup on Berk. Astrid, who at first surpasses Hiccup and the other teens when battling dragons, starts offering advice on how to save the island, so that Hiccup can be the hero in the climactic battle. Before, she was more concerned about competition and coming out on top in Dragon Training, and she loses that aggression after seeing Hiccup as a romantic partner. AvannaK has written numerous analyses on HTTYD and its characters; in a telling post about Astrid, she emphasizes that her dislike is that Miss Hofferson's "purpose is to better Hiccup, to act as a reward or punishment" as opposed to achieving personal growth on her own.This purpose persists through subsequent animation projects in the HTTYD franchise, except for one television episode where we witness the reason for Astrid's competitive spirit. 

In "Hitchups," both Gothi and Astrid receive more notable screen time; in Gothi's case, she helps shape Hiccup's path without him realizing for about thirty chapters. Mentors matter as much as love interests, and Gothi also guides Hiccup into understanding his bond with Toothless better, the price that boy and dragon pay to live together. Gothi sees hope for Berk, and for the Vikings in this unlikely pair, and thus serves as mediator and guide between them. Her presence helps the pair survive a few close calls; when Hiccup sacrifices himself to save Toothless from a lethal axe blow, Gothi's connection to Hiccup allows her to surpass the laws of life and death.  

 
Image source: http://th03.deviantart.net/fs71/300W/i/2011/232/5/4/integrated_ii_by_avannak-d40dr1c.png

Although Astrid remains competitive and aloof in "Hitchups," she remains an independent character who undergoing necessary development. Instead of a focus on Hiccup, AvannaK focuses on Astrid's loyalty to Berk and commitment to Viking war tradition, while inside she feels empty and unfocused. After revealing Hiccup's secret to the village, and becoming the temporary hero for a few weeks, Astrid pushes herself to fight against dragons harder, to prove herself and serve Berk. She quickly rises to the top of the village pecking order, able to choose a betrothed if she wishes, but soon doesn't know what she desires when the dragons may wipe them out. As Avanna writes in "Without a Hitch," "Astrid wanted her wants to matter, but they didn't. Only Berk mattered." 

 
Image source: http://th03.deviantart.net/fs71/300W/i/2011/139/8/3/hitchups__agreed_by_avannak-d3grd3g.jpg

 Because Astrid has time to realize her lack of purpose, and her fears of not living to the war's end, she thus can handle Hiccup's return with more realistic, conflicted emotions. Two years also makes a difference when the two have an argument:

"Hiccup bared a passion in his expression that Astrid was unprepared for, and the first wisps of guilt began to fester. She stamped them out, holding onto her arguments, refusing to play the bad guy to his choices. Her own righteous anger was no longer enough to fuel her belligerence, so Astrid thought of Stoick, of the defeat and grief that poisoned the rest of their village. She thought of the way Hiccup hurt the classmates that looked up to him—Fishlegs, especially." 

Astrid's commitment to tradition conflicts with her desire to help Berk by using unconventional, almost treacherous means to end the war between dragons and Vikings. She hates Hiccup for choosing a dragon over the village, for violating tradition, while ignoring her part in his departure, her unwillingness to listen. Hiccup only convinces her to ride Toothless when, after their argument, he pursues her and asks for her help. He does not force her to get on, and Toothless does not intimidate her into an apology; Hiccup merely sits on his dragon and lets Astrid make the choice, treating her with respect. Astrid after the ride understands what he had protected, her full role in his exile, and how she can help the village change. As they utilize dragons to protect Berk from the raids, and they have a chance to end the war, Astrid sees herself fulfilling the leadership role that Hiccup never wants, to become chief of Berk, and regains her purpose. Hiccup spends too much time traveling to spread knowledge about training dragons or to lead the village, Snotlout and the twins are too grounded on Berk to become proper teachers, and Fishlegs concerns himself more with dragon-related statistics than with practical application. Astrid not only has the courage to face such creatures, but also the willingness to seek them out and explore uncharted waters.

I must emphasize, however, that Astrid does NOT take that role out of guilt for getting Hiccup exiled. She takes Hiccup's place to both improve Berk and to ground herself within changing world, to gain a solid footing as Vikings befriend dragons. She explains in "Without a Hitch" why she decides to leave Berk and assist dragon expert Fishlegs with gathering more knowledge: "She had to separate herself from her nearly crippling desire to please her village and find a solid understand of what she wanted. She experienced too much war in too little time and not enough of life." Astrid recognizes that she wants to have control over her destiny, and managing Berk ensures that control till the end of her days, even at the cost of civil war with the heir Snotlout.

"Hitchups" thus far is the only HTTYD fanfiction that explores such character depth, especially for the two most significant women in the story. I do not include Ruffnut, the female twin who serves as comic relief, because she does not impact the plot despite having more than a few lines. Nor do I include Phelgma, Stoick's second in command, because while she serves best in battle with STOICK, she has few interactions with Hiccup. Very few "what if Hiccup left" fanfiction focuses on empathy for those left behind on Berk, and thesecond-best contender, "Truth and Reconciliation," features too much Stoick hatred for my taste, and not enough sympathy for the characters on Berk. That's a rant of Tumblr worth, however, and we are not talking about variation fics.

I have to confess one thing, however: it took me months to get into "Hitchups," because the opening chapters made me cry when showing Hiccup's departure and the consequences that result on Berk. One consequence, all the Kill Ring dragons getting executed, was a punch in the gut because we get to know those dragons better in the show and cartoon shorts, but it was also necessary to drive home how Hiccup hurt his village by leaving. I dived into the story in the middle, when Hiccup was recovering from a near-death experience. Then I read backwards, so that I could handle the sad bits and enjoy the adventure in full. It's only by reading Avanna's Tumblr posts and analyses on Astrid that I can see the value behind such a story, that it needed to be written.



HTTYD is a boy and dragon story depicting a boy's world, but that does not mean that we have to drop in a new female character to make it a girl's world. A woman wrote the original book series, after all, with strong women featured within it. "Hitchups" takes the same approach; despite focusing on Hiccup and Toothless's travels returns to the two most important women in the plot and define them as people, not love interests. We do not need to accept the limitations that canon imposes, and we should play with such limits. That way, when we write our original stories, we can learn to surpass those limits and write sympathetic, powerful characters.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

One-Year and Three-Month Anniversary: Why I Started Writing Fanfiction Again

This is the first in a series of blog posts about fanfiction. 

One year ago, on October 10, 2012, I started updating fanfiction for the first time since 2003. That was because that year, a new show had started airing in the fall: Dragons: Riders of Berk. The show was based off the film How to Train Your Dragon, which in turn was based off a book series, and promised to bring one of the books' greatest villains to the screen: Alvin the Treacherous. Alvin didn't disappoint in his first appearance, where he succeeded in invading the island of Berk and taking a hostage to find the "Dragon Conqueror," who turned out to be little Hiccup. Even though a skinny teenager kicked his butt with a few dragons, Alvin decided that he would recruit Hiccup to train dragons for him after seeing how Night Furies and Gronckles changed the playing field for battles.

"They ride dragons! We get that boy, and WE'LL ride dragons!"
Image source:  http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbdp63fGHw1ryxe54o1_500.jpg

I asked myself a question after seeing that episode: "Alvin knows that the dragons protect Berk, and Hiccup. Invading again would be a waste of effort for him. Why doesn't he just put a bounty on the Dragon Conqueror, and let other dishonorable Vikings wear out Berk's defenses?"

The result was updating my journal on Deviantart two or three days a week with eight hundred words of prose, centered on that idea. In "How to Protect a Dragon Conqueror," Alvin's men riddle Toothless with poisoned arrows and incapacitate him for two-thirds of the story. Hiccup has to learn to defend himself without a dragon, while realizing that he will injure enemies in cold blood and that Alvin has smeared his reputation in the Archipelago.

This was actual fanart for "How to Protect a Dragon Conqueror", from the opening scene with the arrows impaling Toothless and Hiccup fleeing the scene.
Image source: http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2013/022/7/3/wings_of_arrows_by_ivangriscenko-d5sdem2.jpg

I am an obsessed HTTYD fan, hence why I wrote several blog posts about the movie, and the themes that it presented. This idea of a bounty on Hiccup's head, when I was so obsessed with the show that I'd rewatch my favorite episodes and analyze them, stayed with me, and I finally wrote it down and updated it on my Deviant journal. Then, with my commitment to finish every story that I could, including ones that suddenly gained an influx of readers that wanted to murder Alvin for hurting Toothless.

As it turned out, canon didn't go that far with Alvin. I won't spoil the plot details for those who wish to explore the show for themselves, but the show writers decided to focus on him getting defeated more often than obtaining what he wanted, though he had a few temporary ones and a permanent victory. For each victory, I incorporated them into "Dragon Conqueror" and made the blows against Hiccup and Berk more powerful. The more that I wrote, the more canon disappointed, to the point that my obsession with the show started to wane. A new villain has kept me interested, as has the teaser trailer for the sequel, but I no longer live, breathe and eat fanfiction the way that I used to, though I still write for the HTTYD fandom. That is both a relief and a disappointment, for reasons I'll explain below.

When you use someone else's prose without claiming it as your own -- and if you do, you will find yourself in oodles of legal trouble-- you don't have to create a new world, or new characters. More often than not, as I was, you'll be writing about your favorite characters and espousing their virtues and flaws. I had a major crush on Hiccup, for example, because he was snarky, brilliant and impulsive. With original fiction, the creator has less admiration for her character, more a need to render them as living breathing beings, discovering aspects of their personality as the writing progresses. Original fiction requires rendering shapes and figures on a blank canvas, while fanfiction allows one to merely add brush strokes to a finished canvas.

I learned this lesson while switching back to original fiction for a few days, after writing "Dragon Conqueror." The words felt emptier, less unsure of themselves, like blobs of paint. As a result, I started writing another short HTTYD fanfiction, as a contest entry, in December. Come January, I was writing the sequel to "Dragon Conqueror," which I called "How to Court a Dragon Prince." By the spring, I started an "HTTYD Easter Special" which soon climbed into the 90,000 word count, almost novel-length. "Dragon Prince" concluded in October of this year, and I have only written short one-shots, some pure fluff and some pure drama. The thrill from writing prose with well-defined, established characters did wonders when I exited my comfort zone and practiced world building with different characters.

Writing fanfiction also taught me confidence, that I could write well and earn readers; I learned that action and conflicted characters snag readers, as do action scenes and lots of peril. After I finished Dragon Conqueror in December and started interning for a local theater, I found the courage to rewrite my fantasy wolf novel and to pretend it was fanfiction so that I could revise it with the same vigor that came from writing about Hiccup and Astrid and the Berk gang.  I also made it a personal goal to submit one short story a week this year, after learning that people wanted my prose. So far I have sold about five short stories and have received payment for two of them, so I remain confident that I'm going down the right path.

Let me reiterate one element: you will never, and SHOULD never make money writing fanfiction. Another writer already crafted the territory in which you have made your mark, and he or she will hunt you down for trying to stake a claim on it. I will write another post on plagiarism, and on famous examples that have landed authors in hot water, but I hope that you take that message to heart.


Image source: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4060/4460976042_3daf75b6b6_z.jpg?zz=1


I didn't write "Dragon Conqueror" expecting to make a penny off it. I knew I never would, and so I wrote it for myself. I wrote a story that would never work with the twenty episode format, and probably would never fly with the Cartoon Network censors. I wrote the story that I wanted to see on the screen, with characters undergoing personal changes and exiting their comfort zones. I was just lucky that other readers and Riders of Berk fans wanted to see that story as well. 

Neil Gaiman put it best: "Writing isn't all about pleasing other people. You've got a story to tell, and you're the only one who can tell it."  I can proudly say that I'm the only fanfiction writer who has written about putting a bounty on Hiccup's head, but I would never try to make a profit off that idea.

Next post, I'll talk about the purpose that fanfiction serves for readers, about the gaps that the fandom prose fills with imagination and logical questions. It will probably feature a long discussion on one of the best HTTYD fanfictions out there, "Hitchups," and the gaps that it filled for unsatisfied readers.